Revisited and Updated October 2026
After writing about a dual flush retrofit kit, we became enthused about the idea of installing one of these ourselves and I ultimately installed one when we originally wrote this post in 2010. This job didn’t require a plumber, so I was forced to play with my own toilet. Please excuse if the terminology falls short as we try to explain basic toilet technology.
The original replacement we documented here was in 2010. The toilet was a 1.6 Gallon model installed around 2000. A traditional toilet uses a simple system. The ballcock floats on top of the water. when the tank is emptied, the ballcock lowers, thus activating the fill valve until the
ballcock is lifted up to the off position by the water. The fill valve on this toilet was replaced with a newer, more reliable design, the concentric-float fill valve, and thus there is no ballcock. The concentric design is required for this retrofit kit.
The model was the HYR270 HydroRight Drop-In Dual Flush Converter, purchased at a local Home Depot. The nice thing about this design is that it does not require removal of the toilet tank to install. If you have to go as far as to remove the toilet tank, you might as well buy a new toilet with integrated dual flush, which we recommend if you have a really old toilet.
The toilet already had a newer concentric-float fill valve rather than the old ballcock-style mechanism. The HydroRight itself replaces the flapper, chain and handle; the fill valve is a separate component.
As you can see in the image, this toilet has a typical flapper. The flapper is a rubber stopper that is connected to the handle by a chain. When you press the handle, it pulls up, allowing water to empty from tank to bowl. For this retrofit, we will be replacing the flapper with the retrofit unit.
Installation was surprisingly easy. First we shut off the water and drained the tank. Then we removed the handle and the flapper and set them inside in case the mechanism did not work. The retrofit mechanism slips in place of the flapper and is a tall unit, so you need sufficient clearance. It is then secured with a zip tie in the back to the overflow tube. The overflow tube is next to the drain(where the flapper is normally inserted), and serves the purpose of preventing the tank from overflowing.
A button is then inserted into the hole where the handle once was, and attached to the control box, which is connected to the retrofit unit by a blue cable(as pictured)
Then, after following some calibration tests, your toilet is ready to be more water efficient. Fun, huh? The button mechanism has a low flush for liquid waste and a high flush for solid waste. The actual installation only took about twenty minutes, and we were sure it would be faster a second time. The toilet ran without problems for years after installation.
The only problem is making sure guest know how to properly use the new mechanism, but that is fairly easy to explain. So, for less than thirty dollars, we’ve committed to water savings, efficiency…and it makes for an interesting conversation piece.
The current model of the HydroRight is the HYR271T(Amazon Link). It is available with a lever or a pushbutton version. If you need the fill valve, you can get a bundle with both as well(Amazon Link) . The design is the same as the previous generation.
I kept the HydroRight on my toilet until it was replaced years later and replaced with a toilet that had dual flush from the start. Is converting an older toilet to dual flush still a good idea 16 years after I did it initialy?
In my opinion, the answer is yes. Utility costs like water continue to go up, even if that is not an issue, you may want to help the planet. At some point you may want to replace your toilet, but that isn’t always an option or something you are skilled enough to do yourself. This conversion is something that could reasonably be done by an amateur. It replaces the flapper with the HydroRight unit, which actually for me worked better than the old style flapper, and the concentric ring float valve, which replaced the old ballcock. The worst problem I had was that the button occasionally had to be tightened.





The New York Times













