Skip to main content

Gadget Wisdom

2 Responses

An HDHomeRun with CableCard?

GeekTonic caught this one before us. We’re big fans of the SiliconDust HDHomerun Dual Tuner. SiliconDust has great support, and is well supported under Linux and Windows.

The HDHomerun streams video, once tuned, over the network to your device. Even without the SiliconDust, we think this is part of the future of video. If this device added a decryption device, it would decode the stream and then stream it unencrypted to the computer, allowing access to all channels.

Hopefully, there aren’t any more restrictions beyond that, and they aren’t forced to limit it to Windows only. We could imagine they’d have trouble convincing Cable Labs that Linux users would honor the broadcast flags, but if it does what we hope it does, we’d have one on pre-order the day they came out.

Published on January 3, 2010
Full Post
2 Responses

Didn’t Buy an Ebook Reader – But We Were Alone

The front of the Kindle 1 (Left) and Kindle 2 ...
Image via Wikipedia

For a long time, we wavered on the issue of whether to buy an e-book reader. However, after we got a lot of money this holiday season in Amazon gift cards, we wavered and considered reversing ourselves, even though we have major issues with the Kindle.

This holiday season, for the first time, Kindle books outsold traditional books on Amazon, the Kindle itself was the site’s bestselling product.

But even after this, we don’t think the technology is open enough. We didn’t get into music downloading until Amazon released a DRM-free store. It is all about the freedom.

Our latest contemplation, with the delay of purchasing an e-book reader, is to replace our physical classics with free books from the Google Books project, as they are now available in EPUB format, which can be read using the free and open FBReader. What do you think?

Update: Since this post, we have now purchased a Kindle. The price is now manageable. See below link to current Kindle offering.

[asa]B0051QVESA[/asa]

Published on January 3, 2010
Full Post
1 Response

XBMC Releases Version 9.11

XBMC Media Center
Image via Wikipedia

On December 24th, XBMC Version 9.11 was released. It includes a variety of GUI improvements, and playback improvements, including support for RTMP video streams, which is the system that Flash Video players use.

Like Boxee, which is based on it, it doesn’t compile easily under Fedora(our primary operating system), easily, but has wonderful support under Fedora.

The most wonderful aspect of XBMC, which carried into Boxee are the plugins. A loyal community of scripters write plugins to pull in video and audio content from a variety of sites. The difference between XBMC and Boxee is that Boxee often gets cooperation from the content providers for their plugins…in fact, this is part of their goals.

So, give it a shot.

Published on January 3, 2010
Full Post
1 Response

Is the Telephone Dead?

Picture of a Western Electric candlestick phone.
Image via Wikipedia

GigaOm reported this week that AT&T asked the FCC to eliminate regulatory requirements that it support a landline network and to provide a deadline for phasing it out. Essentially, they want to get out of the landline telephone business. Today, less than 20 percent of Americans rely exclusively on switched-access lines for voice service. So, essentially, they want to stop serving 1 in 5 Americans who haven’t switched.

Now, to some degree what they are asking for makes sense if they wanted to provide the same level of service digitally that they do over the old analog network. During the great Northeast blackout a few years back, the phone was one of the few things that still worked. Would that be the case if there was no copper network? Whatever you can say about copper telephone service…it has become very reliable, and AT&T’s profits from it, while reduced over the last few years, remain significant.

However, AT&T wants the federal government to seize power in this area away from the various state and local regulatory authorities and eliminate state requirements that a carrier serve all people in a geographic area. These are the areas where cellular service is spotty and internet service is nearly impossible to come by. Also, while Emergency 911 services on VoIP services have improved, it is still an issue. Every person should have the right to have a reasonably priced method of communication with the outside world available to them, be it telephone, internet, or a combination thereof.

If AT&T is expecting the government to force the elimination of traditional telephone service like they did analog broadcast television, we would hope the government response is for AT&T to come up with something just as reliable and deployable before any discussion can begin. Trying to make the government do their dirty work for them is ridiculous.

We still keep our landline service, despite dabbling in VoIP and owning cellphones. We have a hard time trusting big corporations, but oddly enough, trusting the telephone company to provide traditional telephone service is something we can do more than trusting the cable company. That is not to say the telephone company thrills us with their service either. It is just harder to mess up a traditional telephone.

Published on January 1, 2010
Full Post
4 Responses

Internet Video May Be Coming to MythTV

Earlier today, on the MythTV Users list, contributor Robert McNamara announced that he and Doug Vaughan(who wrote JAMU and the TVDB grabber) are working on a new plugin for MythT called MythNetVision.

MythTV has had Internet video plugins before. MythStream was one of the earliest. We never could quite get it to work consistently, and it hasn’t been rewritten for MythUI, and those won’t work under MythTV 0.22. None of these have ever been included as part of the official MythTV package, which this has the potential to be.

From their description, it would have the following features:

  • Easy to Extend with Scripts so New Sites can be added. Adding a site would be as simple as parsing an API or site and formatting each item as an RSS article in the output of the script. Parsing happens in the background as long as the frontend is open to keep information current.
  • Support both media which is web-only (by spawning a browser directly to the playback link) and downloadable (by threading off a download and playing in the internal player as soon as enough data is buffered). Also supports external players.
  • Like other MythTV plugins, completely themeable.
  • Compliant with the Terms of Service of the websites it uses and shipped with a number of popular sites already supported. Scripts would only be distributed that were totally compliant, but other scripts could be added separately, outside of the distribution.
  • Two parts: An internet video search and an internet video browser.  Plans to include a “tree view” for a site by dumping the video
    RSS feeds for the site into a grabber config file (adding Revision3 as a fully browseable site would be as simple as dropping the RSS feeds
    in the grabber config).
  • All existing grabbers return full screen, autoplay results when they are available and the API allows. When not possible, the best possible result is played.
  • Downloadable media will be integrated into recordings.
Watch Recordings Menu under Graphite theme
Watch Recordings Menu under Graphite theme

There is a screencast video that can be viewed here. They hope to release by MythTV 0.23, but possibly sooner.

McNamara used the following sites as Examples of sites that should be very easily (and legally) implemented: Comedy Central, The Escapist Magazine, Revision3, Recent Apple Movie Trailers, BBC iPlayer. They’ve already included Youtube, Vimeo, Blip.tv, MTV Video, and TMDB Trailers.

All of them are very interesting. The Escapist just recently unveiled its app in Boxee at the Boxee Beta unveil, for example.

Speaking of Boxee…it has shifted its focus from media stored on a local drive to online content. MythTV has to do the same. It is a DVR software, and should remain so. But with more and more online content becoming available, it needs to address it, and offer ways for that content to become a part of the interface.

MythNetVideo’s design seems to accommodate for that. It launches external programs, or imports video, whichever it can. MythTV doens’t need to be all-encompassing, it can hand off control to other programs. But having that option allows it to be easily extensible, and that is what it needs.

Published on December 16, 2009
Full Post
2 Responses

Review: WD TV Mini Player

Western Digital WD TV Mini Media Player Model WDBAAL0000NBK-NESN

Recently, for a limited time, Newegg offered the Western Digital TV Mini Media Player for $40 including shipping. It is currently listed for $59.99.

The Mini is the little brother of the WD TV and the WD TV Live. The basic differences between the three is that the Mini is SD, and the WD TV Live includes networking capability.

The device has its pros and cons. It is very small, and can playback media from any USB drive formatted to FAT, FAT32, NTFS, or HFS. This makes it useful as a portable device, although the slightly larger WD TV and TV Live have much more functionality. The maximum resolution is 720 x 480 for most files. It doesn’t support MKV or H264 either. But it does support XviD, OGG, etc and a variety of other common formats.

It can playback not only video, but music and pictures.

This weekend, we field-tested it. It was able to playback everything within its defined parameters that we threw at it, including two movies, several Revision3 shows, and some audio podcasts.

Ultimately, this device is not something we’d have in our house. Quite franky we don’t need it. But it is a great device, for the price we paid, to stick in a bag and use to playback your digital media at whatever place you happen to be with a minimum of fuss. Reading reviews, two popular uses are to playback ripped movies and to hook into a car entertainment system.

We hope, however, that firmware updates bring additional features to this device in the future. Although we are not holding our breath.

Published on December 15, 2009
Full Post
2 Responses

Blu-Ray on Linux – Part 2

Blu-Ray Disc logo
Image via Wikipedia

After a lot of consideration between a dedicated hardware blu-ray player and a blu-ray drive, we prepared to take advantage of Newegg’s $49.99 Blu-Ray drive.

At the last minute, we changed to a $129.99 Blu-Ray burner, so we can experiment with blu-ray burning as well as play-back under Linux.

We installed it in a secondary computer, as opposed to our production system, and installed the MakeMKV beta for Linux. It compiled without incident, and was able to rip our test Blu-Ray video to a test drive.

Now, we want to emphasize this very clearly. WE HAVE NO INTENTION OF DISTRIBUTING ANY ILLEGAL VIDEO. Our intention is to be able to exercise our fair use and playback our legally purchased or legally rented videos.

It is a pain in the butt to have to spend this time ripping the Blu-Ray before we can play it. But that is the price we pay for our open-source lifestyle choice.

We figure, for our legally owned(not rented) Blu-Rays, we have two options.

  1. Rip the Blu-Ray, watch it, then delete the working files. This seems to make sense, as a single movie rip is taking up 30GB on a drive. How many of those is it worth storing.
  2. Do above, but create a lower-quality archival copy that can fit on a single DVD. Our first blu-ray came with a digital copy on a separate DVD that can only be played under Windows, so we might as well discard that disc and replace it with our on archival DVD.

Either of these, again, involve a fair amount of preprocessing and working space, however. In the meantime, however, we have a new movie to watch.

Published on December 6, 2009
Full Post
1 Response

Some of Our Issues With Apple – Redux

SAN FRANCISCO - SEPTEMBER 09: (FILE PHOTO) App...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Officially, Gadget Wisdom is not a pro-Apple organization. We admire many of their products, some of us even own them, but it is the issues that keep us from going out and embracing the Apple lifestyle, the fatal flaws for us. We like to bring the issue up every so often. Tonight, we were watching a documentary called MacHeads on Hulu and thought we’d justify ourselves again.

To be fair, we parted ways with Microsoft, except for rare occasions, as well. Many of those reasons are similar. It is an unpopular view to reject these companies in favor of…well, in our case, Linux.

It began many years ago, with the Macintosh Performa. We spent many an hour with a Performa. One time, as was apparently common on this system, the CMOS battery failed. Replacing it could only be done by an Authorized Repair Shop. It was a battery, not a hard drive. So, after several failed attempts, we did replace that battery, voiding our support, and…the thing never fit back together right after that. And after a while, we just let the computer think it was 1969.

But that was years ago. The Performa is generally considered one of Apple’s bigger mistakes. Apple computers have come a long way. They run OS X now, which is a UNIX-based system. They have some user replaceable hardware, which was an issue we always had with them. There is a lot more openness in many areas.

But Apple is a company committed to maintaining its control. It released the iPod, and the features of the iPod were so unique at the time that it was a game changer. Same with the iPhone. But other companies are producing good products too.

Apple’s attitude is epitomized in their ad campaign. In it, John Hodgman plays the older, somewhat goofy PC, versus Justin Long‘s hip younger Apple. We have no problem poking fun at the competition, in moderation, but we’ve never liked the tones. Meanwhile, adoption costs for Macintosh products are significantly more than those of the PC. One could say this is because quality comes with a price.

Which brings us back to the iPhone. The iPhone, a great network-connected handheld device with millions of apps in its app store. Here, we praise Apple for its openness. Anyone can submit an app…if you pay for the development kit and have the equipment to develop it on. So, Apple is making some money there. But, from all reports, what the iPhone is less than satisfactory at is actually being a phone. Some of that may be attributed to the AT&T network though. A problem with the Apple app store is the long approval process, even for updates. Check back with us when we try a Droid(we’re Verizon people). Apple, like many companies, wants to control what we do with their products once they’ve left the Apple Store. The Android OS for mobile phones offers an open platform.

Same thing with the iPod, which ties you to iTunes, which allows more Apple control of your lifestyle. Of course, we’re willing to hand parts of our lives over to Google, so we suppose we shouldn’t talk.

Fed up with the inefficiency of Windows, and the problems there, we, like many Mac Users, left that environment. We went to Linux. Linux, in our opinion, is the operating system for the DIYer. It has its problems, but if you are pissed off at how something works, you have the right to change it yourself. Edit the code, write your own. Conversely, it gives you very little standing if you want to complain. We could have gone to Mac. Some of our correspondents did.

Not long ago, we tried to get someone who would write us a review of their new iPod Touch. The Touch, which is essentially the iPhone minus the phone part(which may be an improvement), as a wi-fi enabled device is something you can advocate giving for people who don’t need the phone functionality, but want a pocket internet device. We’re hoping someone tries this with the Android OS, if they haven’t already. So far, no such review has been submitted to us, however.

So, what it amounts to is a choice. We admire much of Apple’s innovation, but we think it comes at too high a price. Not financially, but when factoring in the restrictions that chafe at our desire for freedom. That is our opinion. What’s yours?

Published on November 29, 2009
Full Post
1 Response

Roku Releases Ten New Content Channels for Video Player

Roku Netflix Player Size Comparison
Image by yonnage via Flickr

We love the idea of the Roku Video Player, formerly the Roku Netflix Player. We’ve been talking about it from early on, and have used one, although we admit to not owning one(not yet, at least).

Today, Roku started releasing a major update for the box. It includes ten new content channels:  Pandora, Facebook Photos, Revision3, Mediafly, TWiT, blip.tv, Flickr, FrameChannel, Motionbox and MobileTribe.

Now, there are some disappointments there. These are good sites, but nothing show stopping, like Hulu, or even Youtube. And the fact they haven’t incorporated streaming from your own home computer is equally disappointing.

The Roku Channel Store, the platform under which these new channels were launched, hopes to become a platform for future development. We’d love to see that.

Published on November 23, 2009
Full Post
1 Response

New Adobe Flash and Air in Beta

Adobe Systems Incorporated
Image via Wikipedia

Last week, Adobe offered up a prerelease of its latest versions of Adobe Air and Adobe Flash. One of the unique things is that they pushed out the beta for Windows, Mac, and Linux. There are a lot of new and exciting features for the new versions.

For Flash, they offer H.264 Hardware Video Acceleration for Windows using UVD2 for ATI Radeon graphics hardware, NVIDIA hardware with PureVideo, Intel GMA 4-Series acceleration support, and even Broadcom video acceleration support via their Crystal HD Enhanced Video Accelerator. Unfortunately for us, as Linux users, they didn’t opt to include Nvidia VDPAU or VA-API support.

For Air, there are a lot of new developer features that will increase functionality when developers integrate them into their programs. For the end-user, the system offers reduced CPU and memory usage, as well as support for features like multitouch.

Ultimately, Adobe plans to push 64-bit Linux versions of these applications. They have had a 64-bit prerelease of Flash for a while which was not updated as part of this beta. 64-Bit Air is held up by waiting for a 64-bit Flash build. No such flash has been released.

We look forward to Adobe pushing out equal versions of Flash for all major operating systems as a matter of policy. We hope they follow through and that more companies follow their example.

Published on November 22, 2009
Full Post

Get New Posts By Email