<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter and IM Clients</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadgetwisdom.com/2009/04/24/twitter-and-im-clients/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadgetwisdom.com/2009/04/24/twitter-and-im-clients/</link>
	<description>Guide to a Tech-Savvy Lifestyle without Emptying Your Wallet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:39:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetwisdom.com/2009/04/24/twitter-and-im-clients/comment-page-1/#comment-2135</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetwisdom.com/?p=350#comment-2135</guid>
		<description>I tried out Trillian Astra recently.  Its user interface is horrific; condensed, and somebody apparently thought that fading out the edges in some sort of misguided Aeroglass copy was a good idea.  All it does is make the text on the left and right side unreadable.  And the Facebook integration is just a jumbled mess.  

So far, there is not one compelling reason why Trillian is better than Digsby.  It&#039;s not.  Not even close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried out Trillian Astra recently.  Its user interface is horrific; condensed, and somebody apparently thought that fading out the edges in some sort of misguided Aeroglass copy was a good idea.  All it does is make the text on the left and right side unreadable.  And the Facebook integration is just a jumbled mess.  </p>
<p>So far, there is not one compelling reason why Trillian is better than Digsby.  It&#8217;s not.  Not even close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
